Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Bio-mining of legacy waste, including excavation, screening, shredding, segregation, treatment and scientific disposal with dump-yard reclamation, was classified under SAC 9994 as waste treatment, disposal and site remediation services and stated to attract GST at 18%. The Authority nevertheless held the supply to Ariyalur Municipality exempt under Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax because it was a pure service, involved no supply of goods, and related to municipal functions such as public health, sanitation and solid waste management entrusted under Article 243W. The separate query on the recipient's status was held outside advance ruling jurisdiction, so no ruling was given on that question.
Bio-mining of legacy waste, including excavation, screening, shredding, segregation, treatment and scientific disposal with dump-yard reclamation, was classified under SAC 9994 as waste treatment, disposal and site remediation services and stated to attract GST at 18%. The Authority nevertheless held the supply to Ariyalur Municipality exempt under Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax because it was a pure service, involved no supply of goods, and related to municipal functions such as public health, sanitation and solid waste management entrusted under Article 243W. The separate query on the recipient's status was held outside advance ruling jurisdiction, so no ruling was given on that question.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
