Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Territorial writ jurisdiction depends on where the dominant, essential and integral facts of the lis arose, not merely on the location of the respondent authority or the place from which the impugned order was issued. Applying the doctrine of forum conveniens and the principle in Kusum Ingots, the HC found that the petitioner's applications and underlying dispute were routed through the Haryana unit, so the foundational cause of action lay outside Delhi. Delhi was therefore not the appropriate forum, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court, leaving all rights and contentions open.
Territorial writ jurisdiction depends on where the dominant, essential and integral facts of the lis arose, not merely on the location of the respondent authority or the place from which the impugned order was issued. Applying the doctrine of forum conveniens and the principle in Kusum Ingots, the HC found that the petitioner's applications and underlying dispute were routed through the Haryana unit, so the foundational cause of action lay outside Delhi. Delhi was therefore not the appropriate forum, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court, leaving all rights and contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.