Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
ITAT held that vehicle-related expenses were not fully proved to...
Vehicle expense apportionment and agricultural income substantiation: ITAT allowed partial business deduction and deleted the reclassification addition.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT held that vehicle-related expenses were not fully proved to be for exclusive business use, but the Revenue also failed to show that the assessee's car was entirely personal; on that basis, 60% of the car depreciation, loan interest and insurance was allowed and 40% disallowed. It also found that agricultural income was sufficiently supported by past receipts and ownership of agricultural land leased for cultivation, so the amount could not be taxed as income from other sources. The addition on account of agricultural income was deleted and the appeal was partly allowed.
ITAT held that vehicle-related expenses were not fully proved to be for exclusive business use, but the Revenue also failed to show that the assessee's car was entirely personal; on that basis, 60% of the car depreciation, loan interest and insurance was allowed and 40% disallowed. It also found that agricultural income was sufficiently supported by past receipts and ownership of agricultural land leased for cultivation, so the amount could not be taxed as income from other sources. The addition on account of agricultural income was deleted and the appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
