Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
A High Court direction in the taxpayer's own case for the same financial year remained binding, and the competent authority could not refuse a nil-rate tax withholding certificate merely because the Department was considering an SLP, especially where no stay had been obtained. The rejection of the application under section 197 was therefore unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to issue the nil-rate withholding certificate within three days for the relevant financial year.
A High Court direction in the taxpayer's own case for the same financial year remained binding, and the competent authority could not refuse a nil-rate tax withholding certificate merely because the Department was considering an SLP, especially where no stay had been obtained. The rejection of the application under section 197 was therefore unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to issue the nil-rate withholding certificate within three days for the relevant financial year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
