Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
A High Court direction in the taxpayer's own case for the same financial year remained binding, and the competent authority could not refuse a nil-rate tax withholding certificate merely because the Department was considering an SLP, especially where no stay had been obtained. The rejection of the application under section 197 was therefore unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to issue the nil-rate withholding certificate within three days for the relevant financial year.
A High Court direction in the taxpayer's own case for the same financial year remained binding, and the competent authority could not refuse a nil-rate tax withholding certificate merely because the Department was considering an SLP, especially where no stay had been obtained. The rejection of the application under section 197 was therefore unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to issue the nil-rate withholding certificate within three days for the relevant financial year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.