Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.