Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.