Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
