Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Leave encashment exemption under section 10(10AA) was held available to the extent of the revised limit, because the claimed amount fell within the threshold prescribed by the CBDT notification and the Tribunal followed co-ordinate Bench decisions on identical facts. In the absence of any contrary judicial view or material from the Revenue, the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and extended exemption within the notified ceiling. The appeal was allowed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.