Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income declared under section 44AD was accepted because the assessee's activity as a Business Correspondent fell within business, not a notified profession under section 44ADA. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not enhance income by applying a 50% rate on an assumption that the assessee "should have" declared that level of income, since section 44AD and section 44ADA operate in distinct fields. In the absence of material showing ineligibility for section 44AD, suppression of receipts, inflated expenses, or incorrect gross receipts, the 50% estimation had no statutory basis and the addition was deleted.
Income declared under section 44AD was accepted because the assessee's activity as a Business Correspondent fell within business, not a notified profession under section 44ADA. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not enhance income by applying a 50% rate on an assumption that the assessee "should have" declared that level of income, since section 44AD and section 44ADA operate in distinct fields. In the absence of material showing ineligibility for section 44AD, suppression of receipts, inflated expenses, or incorrect gross receipts, the 50% estimation had no statutory basis and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.