Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Deduction under section 35AD could not be denied merely because Form No. 10CCB was not filed with the return, where the audit report was furnished before completion of the fresh assessment proceedings. The Tribunal treated the filing requirement as directory, relying on precedent that submission before assessment completion is sufficient. It rejected the Revenue's distinction between original and fresh assessment under section 263, holding that restored proceedings are to be considered afresh and all material filed before completion must be examined. The assessee's disclosure of the claim in the return and tax audit report, together with waiver of depreciation, supported substantive compliance, so the disallowance was unsustainable.
Deduction under section 35AD could not be denied merely because Form No. 10CCB was not filed with the return, where the audit report was furnished before completion of the fresh assessment proceedings. The Tribunal treated the filing requirement as directory, relying on precedent that submission before assessment completion is sufficient. It rejected the Revenue's distinction between original and fresh assessment under section 263, holding that restored proceedings are to be considered afresh and all material filed before completion must be examined. The assessee's disclosure of the claim in the return and tax audit report, together with waiver of depreciation, supported substantive compliance, so the disallowance was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.