Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The Tribunal held that the maximum marginal rate was not applicable where the assessee had exercised the section 115BAC option and declared total income of Rs. 1,45,720. On that basis, the impugned intimation applying MMR was set aside and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute tax without applying MMR. As the surcharge had been levied on the same MMR-based computation, that surcharge also could not stand and was similarly set aside, with recomputation directed on the revised basis.
The Tribunal held that the maximum marginal rate was not applicable where the assessee had exercised the section 115BAC option and declared total income of Rs. 1,45,720. On that basis, the impugned intimation applying MMR was set aside and the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute tax without applying MMR. As the surcharge had been levied on the same MMR-based computation, that surcharge also could not stand and was similarly set aside, with recomputation directed on the revised basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
