Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
In transfer pricing, broad functional comparability under TNMM was applied: Bright Brothers Ltd. was retained because product differences did not matter where functions were broadly similar, and REIL Electricals India Ltd. was included as functionally similar. Working capital adjustment was treated as a valid claim and was directed to be allowed, subject to the assessee furnishing supporting details and data. On royalty, technical know-how and technical services, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the adjustment because CUP was adopted without comparable uncontrolled data and the principle of consistency supported the assessee, as no adjustment had been made in earlier or subsequent years on the same agreements.
In transfer pricing, broad functional comparability under TNMM was applied: Bright Brothers Ltd. was retained because product differences did not matter where functions were broadly similar, and REIL Electricals India Ltd. was included as functionally similar. Working capital adjustment was treated as a valid claim and was directed to be allowed, subject to the assessee furnishing supporting details and data. On royalty, technical know-how and technical services, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the adjustment because CUP was adopted without comparable uncontrolled data and the principle of consistency supported the assessee, as no adjustment had been made in earlier or subsequent years on the same agreements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
