Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
In transfer pricing, broad functional comparability under TNMM was applied: Bright Brothers Ltd. was retained because product differences did not matter where functions were broadly similar, and REIL Electricals India Ltd. was included as functionally similar. Working capital adjustment was treated as a valid claim and was directed to be allowed, subject to the assessee furnishing supporting details and data. On royalty, technical know-how and technical services, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the adjustment because CUP was adopted without comparable uncontrolled data and the principle of consistency supported the assessee, as no adjustment had been made in earlier or subsequent years on the same agreements.
In transfer pricing, broad functional comparability under TNMM was applied: Bright Brothers Ltd. was retained because product differences did not matter where functions were broadly similar, and REIL Electricals India Ltd. was included as functionally similar. Working capital adjustment was treated as a valid claim and was directed to be allowed, subject to the assessee furnishing supporting details and data. On royalty, technical know-how and technical services, the Tribunal upheld deletion of the adjustment because CUP was adopted without comparable uncontrolled data and the principle of consistency supported the assessee, as no adjustment had been made in earlier or subsequent years on the same agreements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
