Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Admissibility of documentary evidence at the appellate stage and...
Admissibility of Documentary Evidence: appellate authority may admit self explanatory documents on first production and uphold deletion of unexplained investment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Admissibility of documentary evidence at the appellate stage and treatment of unexplained investment are addressed. The article explains that an appellate authority has plenary powers coextensive with the assessing officer to examine and admit documentary material, and where documents are self explanatory and go to the root of the matter the appellate authority may admit and rely on them even if produced first on appeal; non compliance with the remand/report procedure did not vitiate the order. On merits, primary documents (loan sanction letter, sale agreement, bank statements) satisfactorily explained the source of investment in jointly acquired properties, warranting deletion of the addition as unexplained investment.
Admissibility of documentary evidence at the appellate stage and treatment of unexplained investment are addressed. The article explains that an appellate authority has plenary powers coextensive with the assessing officer to examine and admit documentary material, and where documents are self explanatory and go to the root of the matter the appellate authority may admit and rely on them even if produced first on appeal; non compliance with the remand/report procedure did not vitiate the order. On merits, primary documents (loan sanction letter, sale agreement, bank statements) satisfactorily explained the source of investment in jointly acquired properties, warranting deletion of the addition as unexplained investment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.