Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6541 to 6560 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Admissibility of documentary evidence at the appellate stage and...
Admissibility of Documentary Evidence: appellate authority may admit self explanatory documents on first production and uphold deletion of unexplained investment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Admissibility of documentary evidence at the appellate stage and treatment of unexplained investment are addressed. The article explains that an appellate authority has plenary powers coextensive with the assessing officer to examine and admit documentary material, and where documents are self explanatory and go to the root of the matter the appellate authority may admit and rely on them even if produced first on appeal; non compliance with the remand/report procedure did not vitiate the order. On merits, primary documents (loan sanction letter, sale agreement, bank statements) satisfactorily explained the source of investment in jointly acquired properties, warranting deletion of the addition as unexplained investment.
Admissibility of documentary evidence at the appellate stage and treatment of unexplained investment are addressed. The article explains that an appellate authority has plenary powers coextensive with the assessing officer to examine and admit documentary material, and where documents are self explanatory and go to the root of the matter the appellate authority may admit and rely on them even if produced first on appeal; non compliance with the remand/report procedure did not vitiate the order. On merits, primary documents (loan sanction letter, sale agreement, bank statements) satisfactorily explained the source of investment in jointly acquired properties, warranting deletion of the addition as unexplained investment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.