Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Validity of auction cancellation under the e-Auction Process Memorandum and IBBI Liquidation Regulations was examined: where a successful bidder fails to pay the balance within the prescribed period (including permitted extensions), the liquidator may cancel the sale and re-auction-cancellation was upheld. Clause 11 permitted forfeiture of the EMD for non payment and that forfeiture was sustained. Applying restitutionary principles to prevent unjust enrichment, the Tribunal held that retention of an additional 25% deposit could not be sustained where the liquidator recovered the same sale consideration in a subsequent auction, and directed refund of that deposit with interest.
Validity of auction cancellation under the e-Auction Process Memorandum and IBBI Liquidation Regulations was examined: where a successful bidder fails to pay the balance within the prescribed period (including permitted extensions), the liquidator may cancel the sale and re-auction-cancellation was upheld. Clause 11 permitted forfeiture of the EMD for non payment and that forfeiture was sustained. Applying restitutionary principles to prevent unjust enrichment, the Tribunal held that retention of an additional 25% deposit could not be sustained where the liquidator recovered the same sale consideration in a subsequent auction, and directed refund of that deposit with interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
