Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal applied a three limb reading of the statutory definition of proceeds of crime, holding that where actual tainted property is not traceable, any other property of equivalent value may be provisionally attached as the "value of any such property", including property acquired prior to the scheduled offence; this preserves the statute's remedial aim and avoids rendering the second limb redundant. On the facts, transactional tracing and recorded statements supported that remittances to a corporate vehicle were used to acquire assets, so those receipts and assets qualified as proceeds of crime or their value. The Tribunal also confirmed that attachment may extend to persons not named in the predicate complaint when material shows involvement with proceeds.
Tribunal applied a three limb reading of the statutory definition of proceeds of crime, holding that where actual tainted property is not traceable, any other property of equivalent value may be provisionally attached as the "value of any such property", including property acquired prior to the scheduled offence; this preserves the statute's remedial aim and avoids rendering the second limb redundant. On the facts, transactional tracing and recorded statements supported that remittances to a corporate vehicle were used to acquire assets, so those receipts and assets qualified as proceeds of crime or their value. The Tribunal also confirmed that attachment may extend to persons not named in the predicate complaint when material shows involvement with proceeds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.