Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
An agreement must be read as a whole; on that basis the authorities correctly found that the JDA constituted a transfer of land chargeable in AY 2005 06, but the court directed that capital gains should not be taxed again in AY 2005 06 where the same sale consideration has already been subjected to tax in AYs 2007 08 and 2008 09. The principle that income is taxable in the relevant assessment year and in the hands of the correct assessee was applied, and the capital gains addition for AY 2005 06 was set aside subject to verification by the Assessing Officer that the consideration was already taxed later.
An agreement must be read as a whole; on that basis the authorities correctly found that the JDA constituted a transfer of land chargeable in AY 2005 06, but the court directed that capital gains should not be taxed again in AY 2005 06 where the same sale consideration has already been subjected to tax in AYs 2007 08 and 2008 09. The principle that income is taxable in the relevant assessment year and in the hands of the correct assessee was applied, and the capital gains addition for AY 2005 06 was set aside subject to verification by the Assessing Officer that the consideration was already taxed later.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.