Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Corrigendum rectifying an inadvertent corporate name error in...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh assessment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Corrigendum rectifying an inadvertent corporate name error in the revision order was held valid where the show cause predated amalgamation and the Principal CIT remedied the clerical mistake; grounds that the order named a non existent entity were rejected. The Tribunal held revisionary jurisdiction applicable to faceless assessments (NaFAC/AU) and found the AO's assessment erroneous and prejudicial for failing to make enquiries he ought to have made-accepting submissions and documents without verification on provisions for doubtful advances, inventory ageing and related party transactions. The matter was remitted for de novo assessment in accordance with the impugned section 263 order.
Corrigendum rectifying an inadvertent corporate name error in the revision order was held valid where the show cause predated amalgamation and the Principal CIT remedied the clerical mistake; grounds that the order named a non existent entity were rejected. The Tribunal held revisionary jurisdiction applicable to faceless assessments (NaFAC/AU) and found the AO's assessment erroneous and prejudicial for failing to make enquiries he ought to have made-accepting submissions and documents without verification on provisions for doubtful advances, inventory ageing and related party transactions. The matter was remitted for de novo assessment in accordance with the impugned section 263 order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
