Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Corrigendum rectifying an inadvertent corporate name error in...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh assessment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Corrigendum rectifying an inadvertent corporate name error in the revision order was held valid where the show cause predated amalgamation and the Principal CIT remedied the clerical mistake; grounds that the order named a non existent entity were rejected. The Tribunal held revisionary jurisdiction applicable to faceless assessments (NaFAC/AU) and found the AO's assessment erroneous and prejudicial for failing to make enquiries he ought to have made-accepting submissions and documents without verification on provisions for doubtful advances, inventory ageing and related party transactions. The matter was remitted for de novo assessment in accordance with the impugned section 263 order.
Corrigendum rectifying an inadvertent corporate name error in the revision order was held valid where the show cause predated amalgamation and the Principal CIT remedied the clerical mistake; grounds that the order named a non existent entity were rejected. The Tribunal held revisionary jurisdiction applicable to faceless assessments (NaFAC/AU) and found the AO's assessment erroneous and prejudicial for failing to make enquiries he ought to have made-accepting submissions and documents without verification on provisions for doubtful advances, inventory ageing and related party transactions. The matter was remitted for de novo assessment in accordance with the impugned section 263 order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
