Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal held that where original goods were exported, a replacement consignment was subsequently exported and the defective originals were re-imported, and a chartered accountant certified no extra charge and that export benefits were claimed only once, the re-importation falls under the provision for replacement consignments (Sr. No. 5) rather than the general re-importation entry (Sr. No. 1). Consequently the appellant may retain the export benefits taken on the original export, is not liable to reverse them with interest, and the amount surrendered to clear the re-imported goods must be refunded on application.
Tribunal held that where original goods were exported, a replacement consignment was subsequently exported and the defective originals were re-imported, and a chartered accountant certified no extra charge and that export benefits were claimed only once, the re-importation falls under the provision for replacement consignments (Sr. No. 5) rather than the general re-importation entry (Sr. No. 1). Consequently the appellant may retain the export benefits taken on the original export, is not liable to reverse them with interest, and the amount surrendered to clear the re-imported goods must be refunded on application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.