Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Tribunal held that where original goods were exported, a replacement consignment was subsequently exported and the defective originals were re-imported, and a chartered accountant certified no extra charge and that export benefits were claimed only once, the re-importation falls under the provision for replacement consignments (Sr. No. 5) rather than the general re-importation entry (Sr. No. 1). Consequently the appellant may retain the export benefits taken on the original export, is not liable to reverse them with interest, and the amount surrendered to clear the re-imported goods must be refunded on application.
Tribunal held that where original goods were exported, a replacement consignment was subsequently exported and the defective originals were re-imported, and a chartered accountant certified no extra charge and that export benefits were claimed only once, the re-importation falls under the provision for replacement consignments (Sr. No. 5) rather than the general re-importation entry (Sr. No. 1). Consequently the appellant may retain the export benefits taken on the original export, is not liable to reverse them with interest, and the amount surrendered to clear the re-imported goods must be refunded on application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
