Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Procedural incompleteness in an insolvency application should be treated as curable rather than a ground to foreclose the applicant's right to initiate CIRP; the adjudicating authority must assess whether the application satisfies statutory completeness and whether a default exists, and must afford the applicant an opportunity to rectify defects before rejecting. Rejection based solely on an auditor's disclaimer or perceived unreliability of financial statements without permitting supplementation is unsustainable; the matter requires fresh consideration with directions to allow production of missing documents and application of settled admission tests.
Procedural incompleteness in an insolvency application should be treated as curable rather than a ground to foreclose the applicant's right to initiate CIRP; the adjudicating authority must assess whether the application satisfies statutory completeness and whether a default exists, and must afford the applicant an opportunity to rectify defects before rejecting. Rejection based solely on an auditor's disclaimer or perceived unreliability of financial statements without permitting supplementation is unsustainable; the matter requires fresh consideration with directions to allow production of missing documents and application of settled admission tests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.