Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Procedural incompleteness in an insolvency application should be treated as curable rather than a ground to foreclose the applicant's right to initiate CIRP; the adjudicating authority must assess whether the application satisfies statutory completeness and whether a default exists, and must afford the applicant an opportunity to rectify defects before rejecting. Rejection based solely on an auditor's disclaimer or perceived unreliability of financial statements without permitting supplementation is unsustainable; the matter requires fresh consideration with directions to allow production of missing documents and application of settled admission tests.
Procedural incompleteness in an insolvency application should be treated as curable rather than a ground to foreclose the applicant's right to initiate CIRP; the adjudicating authority must assess whether the application satisfies statutory completeness and whether a default exists, and must afford the applicant an opportunity to rectify defects before rejecting. Rejection based solely on an auditor's disclaimer or perceived unreliability of financial statements without permitting supplementation is unsustainable; the matter requires fresh consideration with directions to allow production of missing documents and application of settled admission tests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.