Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Procedural incompleteness in an insolvency application should be treated as curable rather than a ground to foreclose the applicant's right to initiate CIRP; the adjudicating authority must assess whether the application satisfies statutory completeness and whether a default exists, and must afford the applicant an opportunity to rectify defects before rejecting. Rejection based solely on an auditor's disclaimer or perceived unreliability of financial statements without permitting supplementation is unsustainable; the matter requires fresh consideration with directions to allow production of missing documents and application of settled admission tests.
Procedural incompleteness in an insolvency application should be treated as curable rather than a ground to foreclose the applicant's right to initiate CIRP; the adjudicating authority must assess whether the application satisfies statutory completeness and whether a default exists, and must afford the applicant an opportunity to rectify defects before rejecting. Rejection based solely on an auditor's disclaimer or perceived unreliability of financial statements without permitting supplementation is unsustainable; the matter requires fresh consideration with directions to allow production of missing documents and application of settled admission tests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.