Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Availability of an efficacious alternative statutory remedy precluded writ relief: the High Court declined to examine merits because the petitioner had not availed the statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act read with Rule 109A. Complaints of non-supply of relied documents, defective service and service dates of summons, alleged non-consideration of replies and non-application of mind were held to arise from the adjudicatory record and fall within the scope of the statutory appellate forum; petition dismissed with liberty to pursue the prescribed appeal.
Availability of an efficacious alternative statutory remedy precluded writ relief: the High Court declined to examine merits because the petitioner had not availed the statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act read with Rule 109A. Complaints of non-supply of relied documents, defective service and service dates of summons, alleged non-consideration of replies and non-application of mind were held to arise from the adjudicatory record and fall within the scope of the statutory appellate forum; petition dismissed with liberty to pursue the prescribed appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.