Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal against assessment orders bars resort to writ jurisdiction; failure to disclose that remedy and a misleading claim of no alternate efficacious remedy warranted dismissal, and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. Disputed factual questions-specifically service of notice by electronic means and infringement of natural justice-are unsuitable for summary resolution in writ proceedings and do not justify bypassing the appellate scheme. All substantive contentions remain open for determination before the appellate forum.
Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal against assessment orders bars resort to writ jurisdiction; failure to disclose that remedy and a misleading claim of no alternate efficacious remedy warranted dismissal, and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. Disputed factual questions-specifically service of notice by electronic means and infringement of natural justice-are unsuitable for summary resolution in writ proceedings and do not justify bypassing the appellate scheme. All substantive contentions remain open for determination before the appellate forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.