Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal against assessment orders bars resort to writ jurisdiction; failure to disclose that remedy and a misleading claim of no alternate efficacious remedy warranted dismissal, and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. Disputed factual questions-specifically service of notice by electronic means and infringement of natural justice-are unsuitable for summary resolution in writ proceedings and do not justify bypassing the appellate scheme. All substantive contentions remain open for determination before the appellate forum.
Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal against assessment orders bars resort to writ jurisdiction; failure to disclose that remedy and a misleading claim of no alternate efficacious remedy warranted dismissal, and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appeal. Disputed factual questions-specifically service of notice by electronic means and infringement of natural justice-are unsuitable for summary resolution in writ proceedings and do not justify bypassing the appellate scheme. All substantive contentions remain open for determination before the appellate forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.