Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Proviso to Rule 22(4) empowers an authorized officer to drop cancellation proceedings and pass Form GST REG 20 where a person served with a show cause notice under Section 29(2)(c) furnishes all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest and late fee; on compliance the officer may also consider restoration of registration and must decide in accordance with law. The period for limitation under Section 73(10) is to be computed from the date of the court order for relevant years, while the specified forthcoming financial year is to be governed by Section 44; petitioners remain liable for arrears including tax, penalty, interest and late fees.
Proviso to Rule 22(4) empowers an authorized officer to drop cancellation proceedings and pass Form GST REG 20 where a person served with a show cause notice under Section 29(2)(c) furnishes all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest and late fee; on compliance the officer may also consider restoration of registration and must decide in accordance with law. The period for limitation under Section 73(10) is to be computed from the date of the court order for relevant years, while the specified forthcoming financial year is to be governed by Section 44; petitioners remain liable for arrears including tax, penalty, interest and late fees.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
