Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Proviso to Rule 22(4) empowers an authorized officer to drop cancellation proceedings and pass Form GST REG 20 where a person served with a show cause notice under Section 29(2)(c) furnishes all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest and late fee; on compliance the officer may also consider restoration of registration and must decide in accordance with law. The period for limitation under Section 73(10) is to be computed from the date of the court order for relevant years, while the specified forthcoming financial year is to be governed by Section 44; petitioners remain liable for arrears including tax, penalty, interest and late fees.
Proviso to Rule 22(4) empowers an authorized officer to drop cancellation proceedings and pass Form GST REG 20 where a person served with a show cause notice under Section 29(2)(c) furnishes all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest and late fee; on compliance the officer may also consider restoration of registration and must decide in accordance with law. The period for limitation under Section 73(10) is to be computed from the date of the court order for relevant years, while the specified forthcoming financial year is to be governed by Section 44; petitioners remain liable for arrears including tax, penalty, interest and late fees.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
