Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5541 to 5560 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Proviso to Rule 22(4) empowers an authorized officer to drop cancellation proceedings and pass Form GST REG 20 where a person served with a show cause notice under Section 29(2)(c) furnishes all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest and late fee; on compliance the officer may also consider restoration of registration and must decide in accordance with law. The period for limitation under Section 73(10) is to be computed from the date of the court order for relevant years, while the specified forthcoming financial year is to be governed by Section 44; petitioners remain liable for arrears including tax, penalty, interest and late fees.
Proviso to Rule 22(4) empowers an authorized officer to drop cancellation proceedings and pass Form GST REG 20 where a person served with a show cause notice under Section 29(2)(c) furnishes all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest and late fee; on compliance the officer may also consider restoration of registration and must decide in accordance with law. The period for limitation under Section 73(10) is to be computed from the date of the court order for relevant years, while the specified forthcoming financial year is to be governed by Section 44; petitioners remain liable for arrears including tax, penalty, interest and late fees.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
