Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Where a registrant served with a show cause notice under the GST regime furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fee as required by the proviso to sub rule (4) of Rule 22, the proper officer has jurisdiction to drop cancellation proceedings and pass the prescribed restoration order; petitioners were permitted to apply to the authority within two months and the authority must consider and decide expeditiously. The court directed that limitation for recovery under Section 73(10) be computed from the date of this order, except that the financial year 2025 26 is governed by Section 44; liability for arrears, interest, penalty and fees remains.
Where a registrant served with a show cause notice under the GST regime furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fee as required by the proviso to sub rule (4) of Rule 22, the proper officer has jurisdiction to drop cancellation proceedings and pass the prescribed restoration order; petitioners were permitted to apply to the authority within two months and the authority must consider and decide expeditiously. The court directed that limitation for recovery under Section 73(10) be computed from the date of this order, except that the financial year 2025 26 is governed by Section 44; liability for arrears, interest, penalty and fees remains.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
