Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Allowability of business expenditure: the tribunal applied its prior assessment-year finding on identical facts that power and fuel costs from a captive power plant were genuine business expenses utilised for manufacturing, and therefore upheld deletion of their disallowance against the assessee. Disallowance under Rule 8D: the tribunal reiterated that disallowance calculated under the rule cannot exceed the amount of exempt income for the year, rejected reliance on an administrative circular to enlarge the disallowance, and sustained the CIT(A)'s restriction to exempt income. Appeals allowed for the assessee; revenue appeals dismissed.
Allowability of business expenditure: the tribunal applied its prior assessment-year finding on identical facts that power and fuel costs from a captive power plant were genuine business expenses utilised for manufacturing, and therefore upheld deletion of their disallowance against the assessee. Disallowance under Rule 8D: the tribunal reiterated that disallowance calculated under the rule cannot exceed the amount of exempt income for the year, rejected reliance on an administrative circular to enlarge the disallowance, and sustained the CIT(A)'s restriction to exempt income. Appeals allowed for the assessee; revenue appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.