Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Deduction for indexed cost of improvement was allowed in part where documentary proof was incomplete: exercising evaluative discretion, the Tribunal permitted 80% of the improvement cost claimed to be adopted for computing the indexed cost of improvement and directed the assessing officer to recompute and grant the deduction accordingly, setting aside the contrary appellate finding; the Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The operative effect requires the AO to apply 80% of claimed improvement amounts for the specified years and allow corresponding indexed deduction.
Deduction for indexed cost of improvement was allowed in part where documentary proof was incomplete: exercising evaluative discretion, the Tribunal permitted 80% of the improvement cost claimed to be adopted for computing the indexed cost of improvement and directed the assessing officer to recompute and grant the deduction accordingly, setting aside the contrary appellate finding; the Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The operative effect requires the AO to apply 80% of claimed improvement amounts for the specified years and allow corresponding indexed deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.