Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
The HC directed the Chief Engineer to decide the petitioner's pending representation by a self-contained speaking order within 90 days, taking into account specified documentary annexures; if the petitioner is found entitled to any contractual dues, respondent must release the amount with interest from the date of entitlement until payment, applying the principle in Union of India v. Willowood Chemicals. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits. The order prescribes a timeline, mandates consideration of evidence, and fixes interest as the remedy for delayed payment rather than adjudicating substantive claims.
The HC directed the Chief Engineer to decide the petitioner's pending representation by a self-contained speaking order within 90 days, taking into account specified documentary annexures; if the petitioner is found entitled to any contractual dues, respondent must release the amount with interest from the date of entitlement until payment, applying the principle in Union of India v. Willowood Chemicals. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits. The order prescribes a timeline, mandates consideration of evidence, and fixes interest as the remedy for delayed payment rather than adjudicating substantive claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
