Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
The HC directed the Chief Engineer to decide the petitioner's pending representation by a self-contained speaking order within 90 days, taking into account specified documentary annexures; if the petitioner is found entitled to any contractual dues, respondent must release the amount with interest from the date of entitlement until payment, applying the principle in Union of India v. Willowood Chemicals. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits. The order prescribes a timeline, mandates consideration of evidence, and fixes interest as the remedy for delayed payment rather than adjudicating substantive claims.
The HC directed the Chief Engineer to decide the petitioner's pending representation by a self-contained speaking order within 90 days, taking into account specified documentary annexures; if the petitioner is found entitled to any contractual dues, respondent must release the amount with interest from the date of entitlement until payment, applying the principle in Union of India v. Willowood Chemicals. The Court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits. The order prescribes a timeline, mandates consideration of evidence, and fixes interest as the remedy for delayed payment rather than adjudicating substantive claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
