Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules by Notification No.20/2024, made without a saving clause, operates prospectively and applies to pending non final proceedings, causing proceedings founded on the omitted rule (including undisposed show cause notices and non final orders) to lapse. Consequentially, impugned non final orders are quashed and petitioners are entitled to have their IGST refund claims for export of goods processed or restored for processing. Where no alternate appellate forum exists or tribunal is unconstituted, orders not finally adjudicated cannot be treated as final, reinforcing entitlement to refund processing within prescribed timeframes.
Omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules by Notification No.20/2024, made without a saving clause, operates prospectively and applies to pending non final proceedings, causing proceedings founded on the omitted rule (including undisposed show cause notices and non final orders) to lapse. Consequentially, impugned non final orders are quashed and petitioners are entitled to have their IGST refund claims for export of goods processed or restored for processing. Where no alternate appellate forum exists or tribunal is unconstituted, orders not finally adjudicated cannot be treated as final, reinforcing entitlement to refund processing within prescribed timeframes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
