Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3321 to 3340 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Writ petitions challenging search and seizure were held premature because the statutory investigative process had advanced to issuance of show-cause notices under the CGST Act; petitioners must first exhaust the statutory remedy and may attack any final Order-in-Original. The court applied judicial restraint, confining review of the recorded reasons to Wednesbury reasonableness and refusing to rehear administrative judgment on its merits. Requests for immediate release of goods were denied, with provisional release permitted only on production of valid bills, challans or receipts or by following the Section 67(6)/Rule 140(1) provisional-release procedure and furnishing a bond.
Writ petitions challenging search and seizure were held premature because the statutory investigative process had advanced to issuance of show-cause notices under the CGST Act; petitioners must first exhaust the statutory remedy and may attack any final Order-in-Original. The court applied judicial restraint, confining review of the recorded reasons to Wednesbury reasonableness and refusing to rehear administrative judgment on its merits. Requests for immediate release of goods were denied, with provisional release permitted only on production of valid bills, challans or receipts or by following the Section 67(6)/Rule 140(1) provisional-release procedure and furnishing a bond.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
