Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Challenge to the warrant of authorization raised identical legal contention already admitted before a tribunal and pending as an appeal in another High Court; applying the abstention principle for parallel proceedings, the High Court declined to entertain a fresh writ on the same controversy and dismissed the petition while granting liberty to seek framing of an additional substantial question of law in the pending appeal. The outcome turns on duplicative litigation and preservation of appellate remedy rather than re examination of the authorization on merits.
Challenge to the warrant of authorization raised identical legal contention already admitted before a tribunal and pending as an appeal in another High Court; applying the abstention principle for parallel proceedings, the High Court declined to entertain a fresh writ on the same controversy and dismissed the petition while granting liberty to seek framing of an additional substantial question of law in the pending appeal. The outcome turns on duplicative litigation and preservation of appellate remedy rather than re examination of the authorization on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
