Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Proof of foreign public documents must comply with the statutory...
Proof of foreign public documents requires originals or certified diplomatic/notarial copies; inspection must occur in-magna presence and cross-examination proceed immediately.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Proof of foreign public documents must comply with the statutory proof regime under Section 78(6) of the Indian Evidence Act: originals or certified copies bearing notarial or diplomatic certification are required, and official transmission alone does not dispense with that mode of proof. Where authenticity is challenged, the accused is entitled to inspect the originals during the cross-examination of the prosecution witness to verify certification; inspection must occur in the presence of the magistrate and cross-examination must proceed immediately thereafter. A trial court may not refuse production solely by labelling the request as a delay tactic; costs imposed on that basis were set aside and production was directed.
Proof of foreign public documents must comply with the statutory proof regime under Section 78(6) of the Indian Evidence Act: originals or certified copies bearing notarial or diplomatic certification are required, and official transmission alone does not dispense with that mode of proof. Where authenticity is challenged, the accused is entitled to inspect the originals during the cross-examination of the prosecution witness to verify certification; inspection must occur in the presence of the magistrate and cross-examination must proceed immediately thereafter. A trial court may not refuse production solely by labelling the request as a delay tactic; costs imposed on that basis were set aside and production was directed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.