Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cu...
Provisional release on security permitted where cash deposit plus bond secures differential duty; classification and treaty benefits referred for deci...
Customs Valuation Rule Sequence must be followed; single-comparator re-determination and penalties set aside without comparability or proof of mis-dec...
Separately Identifiable Services: transportation found to be the essential character, so Cargo Handling classification and extended limitation rejecte...
Proof of foreign public documents must comply with the statutory...
Proof of foreign public documents requires originals or certified diplomatic/notarial copies; inspection must occur in-magna presence and cross-examination proceed immediately.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Proof of foreign public documents must comply with the statutory proof regime under Section 78(6) of the Indian Evidence Act: originals or certified copies bearing notarial or diplomatic certification are required, and official transmission alone does not dispense with that mode of proof. Where authenticity is challenged, the accused is entitled to inspect the originals during the cross-examination of the prosecution witness to verify certification; inspection must occur in the presence of the magistrate and cross-examination must proceed immediately thereafter. A trial court may not refuse production solely by labelling the request as a delay tactic; costs imposed on that basis were set aside and production was directed.
Proof of foreign public documents must comply with the statutory proof regime under Section 78(6) of the Indian Evidence Act: originals or certified copies bearing notarial or diplomatic certification are required, and official transmission alone does not dispense with that mode of proof. Where authenticity is challenged, the accused is entitled to inspect the originals during the cross-examination of the prosecution witness to verify certification; inspection must occur in the presence of the magistrate and cross-examination must proceed immediately thereafter. A trial court may not refuse production solely by labelling the request as a delay tactic; costs imposed on that basis were set aside and production was directed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
