Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid...
Prior Sanction Requirement: absence of prescribed approval invalidates reassessment notice; limitation also bars notice if escaped income below threshold.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid reassessment notices: first, the substituted reassessment regime mandates prior sanction by the specific higher authority defined in section 151 before issuing a notice under section 148 where more than three years have elapsed, and absence of that prescribed approval renders the notice void; second, section 149(1)(b) restricts reassessment beyond three years to cases where escaped income meets the statutory monetary threshold, and an alleged escape below that threshold bars issuance of a notice. Applying both principles, the notice was void and reassessment was set aside.
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid reassessment notices: first, the substituted reassessment regime mandates prior sanction by the specific higher authority defined in section 151 before issuing a notice under section 148 where more than three years have elapsed, and absence of that prescribed approval renders the notice void; second, section 149(1)(b) restricts reassessment beyond three years to cases where escaped income meets the statutory monetary threshold, and an alleged escape below that threshold bars issuance of a notice. Applying both principles, the notice was void and reassessment was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.