Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid...
Prior Sanction Requirement: absence of prescribed approval invalidates reassessment notice; limitation also bars notice if escaped income below threshold.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid reassessment notices: first, the substituted reassessment regime mandates prior sanction by the specific higher authority defined in section 151 before issuing a notice under section 148 where more than three years have elapsed, and absence of that prescribed approval renders the notice void; second, section 149(1)(b) restricts reassessment beyond three years to cases where escaped income meets the statutory monetary threshold, and an alleged escape below that threshold bars issuance of a notice. Applying both principles, the notice was void and reassessment was set aside.
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid reassessment notices: first, the substituted reassessment regime mandates prior sanction by the specific higher authority defined in section 151 before issuing a notice under section 148 where more than three years have elapsed, and absence of that prescribed approval renders the notice void; second, section 149(1)(b) restricts reassessment beyond three years to cases where escaped income meets the statutory monetary threshold, and an alleged escape below that threshold bars issuance of a notice. Applying both principles, the notice was void and reassessment was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.