Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6581 to 6600 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid...
Prior Sanction Requirement: absence of prescribed approval invalidates reassessment notice; limitation also bars notice if escaped income below threshold.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid reassessment notices: first, the substituted reassessment regime mandates prior sanction by the specific higher authority defined in section 151 before issuing a notice under section 148 where more than three years have elapsed, and absence of that prescribed approval renders the notice void; second, section 149(1)(b) restricts reassessment beyond three years to cases where escaped income meets the statutory monetary threshold, and an alleged escape below that threshold bars issuance of a notice. Applying both principles, the notice was void and reassessment was set aside.
The article addresses two dominant legal conditions for valid reassessment notices: first, the substituted reassessment regime mandates prior sanction by the specific higher authority defined in section 151 before issuing a notice under section 148 where more than three years have elapsed, and absence of that prescribed approval renders the notice void; second, section 149(1)(b) restricts reassessment beyond three years to cases where escaped income meets the statutory monetary threshold, and an alleged escape below that threshold bars issuance of a notice. Applying both principles, the notice was void and reassessment was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.