Consultancy fees claimed as business expense-can tax disallowance rest on survey suspicion despite invoices, contracts and bank trail? Appeal dismisse...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7501 to 7520 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment of assessable value based solely on an empanelled Chartered Engineer certificate was held impermissible where the sequential valuation steps under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and adequate market evidence were not followed; the enhanced value was set aside and the declared value accepted. Imports of restricted MFD parts were not subject to absolute confiscation where authorisation was lacking; redemption was allowed with a fine fixed at 10% and a penalty fixed at 5% of the assessable value. Earlier precedent rejecting engineer-certificate-only enhancement and permitting redemption governed the outcome.
Reassessment of assessable value based solely on an empanelled Chartered Engineer certificate was held impermissible where the sequential valuation steps under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and adequate market evidence were not followed; the enhanced value was set aside and the declared value accepted. Imports of restricted MFD parts were not subject to absolute confiscation where authorisation was lacking; redemption was allowed with a fine fixed at 10% and a penalty fixed at 5% of the assessable value. Earlier precedent rejecting engineer-certificate-only enhancement and permitting redemption governed the outcome.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
