Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment of assessable value based solely on an empanelled Chartered Engineer certificate was held impermissible where the sequential valuation steps under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and adequate market evidence were not followed; the enhanced value was set aside and the declared value accepted. Imports of restricted MFD parts were not subject to absolute confiscation where authorisation was lacking; redemption was allowed with a fine fixed at 10% and a penalty fixed at 5% of the assessable value. Earlier precedent rejecting engineer-certificate-only enhancement and permitting redemption governed the outcome.
Reassessment of assessable value based solely on an empanelled Chartered Engineer certificate was held impermissible where the sequential valuation steps under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and adequate market evidence were not followed; the enhanced value was set aside and the declared value accepted. Imports of restricted MFD parts were not subject to absolute confiscation where authorisation was lacking; redemption was allowed with a fine fixed at 10% and a penalty fixed at 5% of the assessable value. Earlier precedent rejecting engineer-certificate-only enhancement and permitting redemption governed the outcome.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.