Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Reassessment of assessable value based solely on an empanelled Chartered Engineer certificate was held impermissible where the sequential valuation steps under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and adequate market evidence were not followed; the enhanced value was set aside and the declared value accepted. Imports of restricted MFD parts were not subject to absolute confiscation where authorisation was lacking; redemption was allowed with a fine fixed at 10% and a penalty fixed at 5% of the assessable value. Earlier precedent rejecting engineer-certificate-only enhancement and permitting redemption governed the outcome.
Reassessment of assessable value based solely on an empanelled Chartered Engineer certificate was held impermissible where the sequential valuation steps under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 and adequate market evidence were not followed; the enhanced value was set aside and the declared value accepted. Imports of restricted MFD parts were not subject to absolute confiscation where authorisation was lacking; redemption was allowed with a fine fixed at 10% and a penalty fixed at 5% of the assessable value. Earlier precedent rejecting engineer-certificate-only enhancement and permitting redemption governed the outcome.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.