Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Whether challenged rights issues, consequent allotments and share transfers constituted oppression or mismanagement was considered; Tribunal held the Board acted within the Articles of Association and statutory powers in increasing authorised capital and making rights allotments, the contractual and statutory conditions were satisfied, and therefore the actions did not amount to oppression or mismanagement. An interim/anticipatory prayer to restrain loss of promoter status was dismissed as premature because it rested on apprehension without a concrete act; the appellants were left free to seek relief if an actual oppressive or mismanagement act occurs. Appeal dismissed.
Whether challenged rights issues, consequent allotments and share transfers constituted oppression or mismanagement was considered; Tribunal held the Board acted within the Articles of Association and statutory powers in increasing authorised capital and making rights allotments, the contractual and statutory conditions were satisfied, and therefore the actions did not amount to oppression or mismanagement. An interim/anticipatory prayer to restrain loss of promoter status was dismissed as premature because it rested on apprehension without a concrete act; the appellants were left free to seek relief if an actual oppressive or mismanagement act occurs. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
