Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Whether challenged rights issues, consequent allotments and share transfers constituted oppression or mismanagement was considered; Tribunal held the Board acted within the Articles of Association and statutory powers in increasing authorised capital and making rights allotments, the contractual and statutory conditions were satisfied, and therefore the actions did not amount to oppression or mismanagement. An interim/anticipatory prayer to restrain loss of promoter status was dismissed as premature because it rested on apprehension without a concrete act; the appellants were left free to seek relief if an actual oppressive or mismanagement act occurs. Appeal dismissed.
Whether challenged rights issues, consequent allotments and share transfers constituted oppression or mismanagement was considered; Tribunal held the Board acted within the Articles of Association and statutory powers in increasing authorised capital and making rights allotments, the contractual and statutory conditions were satisfied, and therefore the actions did not amount to oppression or mismanagement. An interim/anticipatory prayer to restrain loss of promoter status was dismissed as premature because it rested on apprehension without a concrete act; the appellants were left free to seek relief if an actual oppressive or mismanagement act occurs. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
